<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What are good brands for digital cameras?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedigitalphotographyjournal.com/digital-cameras/what-are-good-brands-for-digital-cameras/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedigitalphotographyjournal.com/digital-cameras/what-are-good-brands-for-digital-cameras/</link>
	<description>Digital Photography Tips Guides Reviews and advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:00:14 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: melissuuuuh[:</title>
		<link>http://www.thedigitalphotographyjournal.com/digital-cameras/what-are-good-brands-for-digital-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>melissuuuuh[:</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 05:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedigitalphotographyjournal.com/digital-cameras/what-are-good-brands-for-digital-cameras/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>CANON !
i think it&#039;s the best out of everything.
the pictures come out really clear &amp; it&#039;s always good quality.

i love it [:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CANON !<br />
i think it&#8217;s the best out of everything.<br />
the pictures come out really clear &#038; it&#8217;s always good quality.</p>
<p>i love it [:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ~. DelAmore .~</title>
		<link>http://www.thedigitalphotographyjournal.com/digital-cameras/what-are-good-brands-for-digital-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>~. DelAmore .~</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 06:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedigitalphotographyjournal.com/digital-cameras/what-are-good-brands-for-digital-cameras/#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Sony &amp; Canon of course


I&#039;ve got an Olympius right now. Well it&#039;s anti shock and water proof so pretty cool but the pics just don&#039;t satisfy me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sony &#038; Canon of course</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got an Olympius right now. Well it&#8217;s anti shock and water proof so pretty cool but the pics just don&#8217;t satisfy me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fishmeister</title>
		<link>http://www.thedigitalphotographyjournal.com/digital-cameras/what-are-good-brands-for-digital-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Fishmeister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedigitalphotographyjournal.com/digital-cameras/what-are-good-brands-for-digital-cameras/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re ALL good!!... Oh deary, deary me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re ALL good!!&#8230; Oh deary, deary me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://www.thedigitalphotographyjournal.com/digital-cameras/what-are-good-brands-for-digital-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedigitalphotographyjournal.com/digital-cameras/what-are-good-brands-for-digital-cameras/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Nixon and Canon are my pics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nixon and Canon are my pics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
